I can remember my mom hanging clothes out on the line to dry.
We had a clothes dryer but she sometimes decided to place the nicer clothes out on the clothes line instead of tossing them in the dryer.
Our neighbor did the same. She even had two "T" shaped metal posts with the lines strung in between. Another neighbor had a post with a contraption on top where multiple lines circled one another.
Heck, I hang clothes out to dry sometimes too.
I just read a story about a Pennsylvania woman who has received warnings from her housing association asking her to stop drying her clothes outside. She also received two anonymous letters saying they didn't want to see her "underwear flapping about."
U.S. residents fight for the right to hang laundry
For the record, she hangs her unmentionables inside, according to the Reuters story published Nov. 18.
"They said it made the place look like trailer trash," she said, in her yard across the street from a row of neat, suburban houses. "They said they didn't want to look at my 'unmentionables.'"
There's now a group called the Project Laundry List who argues "people can save money and reduce carbon emissions by not using their electric or gas dryers."
The main opponents of the group are housing associations such as condominiums and townhouse communities.
The opponents say the no-hanging rules are an aesthetic issue since people in those type of communities don't want to see other people's laundry hanging on the line.
Good grief. With all the hoopla about "going green" and saving the planet what's up with the "thou shall not hang" people? Hybrid cars good, using the power of the sun and wind to dry clothes bad.
Let me know what you think. Let's grind.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
4 comments:
The Daily Grind is moderated by members of The Port Arthur News. While we encourage thoughtful, insightful responses from the public, we do discourage the use of profanity, racial or malicious remarks towards Daily Grind contributors or those who leave comments on the blog. We also reserve the right to delete such comments, or comments containing online solicitors.
But please, don't let this discourage you from a heartfelt reply. Comment to your heart's desire. Let us know what gets your gears grinding!
Also, we'd like you to use your name, so we know who you are! And if you don't want to use your name, use your city so we know where the Grind is reaching!
Grind it!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I was amused by this because my parents have been going through something similiar. They purchased their home in 1970 in one of the original "planned communities" in their state. Included in every yard in the subdivision was a structure for hanging laundry--it came complete with laundry lines and had partial wooden walls on two sides to shield laundry from direct view (there is approximately two feet of open space at the top and bottom to allow air circuation on those two sides). Fast forward 35 years...my parents receive a letter from the homeowners' association (HOA) informing them that they are in violation because their laundry can be seen from the street. My dad responds with the statement that the structure has been there since the developer put it there, and that laundry is shielded from direct view by the walls on the two sides. No go. The HOA threatens my eighty-year-old parents with fines. Law-abiding citizens that they are, they purchase a clothes dryer for the first time in their lives and now use electricity to dry their clothes. I miss the fresh smell of Mom's line-dried laundry! Reader in Nederland
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading the article above , really explains everything in detail,the article is very interesting and effective.Thank you and good luck for the upcoming article @ Packers And Movers Delhi
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteSuperb post, we enjoyed each and everything as per written in your post. Thank you for this informative article because it’s really helpful, I really like site.
Please visit our website: Packers And Movers Mumbai
f3i41i3i52 l6w39f7j15 k9k28s2v09 c1v57c7m67 h7q92y9m86 x5h02q1u72
ReplyDelete